Corpus

Corpus is the dump and the study notes. Published targets use our synthesis — see Home and Method. The board uses what we publish.

Study note — O’Keefe et al. 2023 (Mo Med training strategies)

Shelf: Siim-cited
Full-text access: Yes — open on PMC (HTML full text).
Fetched 2026-09-18 from https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10121111/ · PMID 37091937.
Siim site link: this is the exact (R) href next to his “2023 systematic review” moderate-vs-vigorous mortality paragraph on siimland.co/my-longevity-routine (verified scrape 2026-09-18).
Labels: [Paper] = stated in the article · [Inference] = our take for Product / Zone 2.


Citation

O’Keefe JH, O’Keefe EL, Eckert R, Lavie CJ.
Training Strategies to Optimize Cardiovascular Durability and Life Expectancy.
Missouri Medicine. 2023 Mar–Apr;120(2):155–162.
PMID 37091937 · PMC PMC10121111
(PubMed publication types include Systematic Review / Meta-Analysis / Journal Article; body is a narrative systematic review of 2011–2022 PubMed literature, not a new pooled meta-analysis of primary effect sizes.)


Methods [Paper]


Key results (numbers) [Paper]

Centered on Lee DH et al. Circulation 2022 (their ref 2; our note Lee 2022):


Limitations / catch [Paper] + [Inference]

  1. Narrative synthesis of others’ epidemiology — not a new RCT and not a de novo dose–response meta with extractable −17% / −35% cells.
  2. Heavily interpretive of Lee 2022 figures; wording like “at least two-fold better” is authors’ synthesis, not a single Lee table cell we can paste.
  3. Observational base (Lee) → residual confounding, self-report PA, reverse causation risk.
  4. Does not prescribe Zone 2 HR bands or 2×/week session doses — longevity framing for intensity mix only.

What we take for Zone 2 [Inference]


vs Siim’s use

Siim (site) Paper
Calls it a “2023 systematic review [Paper] PubMed types include Systematic Review; content is narrative SR — genre match OK
More moderate → lower ACM; vigorous plateaus; moderate keeps helping at high weekly volumes [Paper] Same direction via Lee discussion (~150 min/wk VPA plateau; MPA dose-dependent)
−17% vs −35% Not found as those exact percentages in the O’Keefe full text we read
Plateau after “200 minutes/week” vigorous O’Keefe text centers on “~150 minutes/week” VPA (Lee’s near-max band is broader, ~150–300) — Partial
800 min/week better than 200 min/week” moderate Not found as that exact contrast in O’Keefe; Lee discusses continued MPA benefit through higher categories (e.g. 300–599) with ≥600 similar to 300–599 — Partial / Siim framing

Match to Siim claim: Partial — this is his (R), direction matches, exact −17/−35 and 200/800 numbers not verified in full text.


Paywall note

Not paywalled via PMC HTML for this pass.